Search for: "Robert S. Thomas, II"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,009
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2023, 3:42 pm
Roberts then announces that he has Biden v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 2:48 pm
Chief Justice Roberts authored the majority opinion, which Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett joined. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:34 pm
University of Texas II (2016). [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 7:17 am
Gold and Robert W. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 6:55 am
The Banking Union: From the Past to the Future, Kern AlexanderPart II. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:34 am
Harper, ISL allows state court review via "procedural" constitutional provisions but not "substantive" ones.Today's majority opinion by Chief Justice Roberts rejects nearly every version of ISL. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 am
” Article II’s electors clause provides that states shall appoint presidential electors for the Electoral College “in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 3:32 am
Roberts (1980) imposed a “reliability” standard to determine whether out-of-court testimony could be introduced. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:32 pm
Roberts (1980) imposed a "reliability" standard to determine whether out-of-court testimony could be introduced. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:13 am
II, §1, cl. 1; §3. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:03 am
” But that power was changed, Alito stressed, after King James II was deposed in the revolution. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:39 am
S. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Part II discusses how, despite considerable changes in the world, the climate change regime has stayed much the same. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 8:56 pm
Justice Thomas's dissent urged the Court to consider, in the appropriate case, whether the qui tam provision is consistent with Article II. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:57 am
Robert Thomas has a helpful and detailed discussion of various aspects of this decision at the Inverse Condemnation blog. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:39 am
This analysis, which stretches about two pages, appears in Part II-C-2 of the concurrence. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Gorsuch and Thomas alone excavated history in their concurrence and dissent, respectively (although Justices Sotomayor and Jackson joined Gorsuch’s concurrence, they did not join section II, which explored how framing history bore on Congressional plenary power over tribes). [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
But he also went on to suggest that the FCA’s qui tam provisions are unconstitutional because they violate the unitary executive theory of Article II. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
What interests me is the dissent by Justice Thomas--joined in this respect by Kavanaugh and Barrett in a concurrence--contending that in a future case the Court should consider whether such so-called qui tam suits are consistent with Article II. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am
Kagan moves on to “The Hangover: Part II. [read post]
