Search for: "Rodriguez v. Miller"
Results 61 - 80
of 87
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
Rodriguez, involving immigrant detention, and Sessions v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:04 pm
feature=player_embedded&v=wyx6JDQCslE&oref=http%3A%2F%2Fs.ytimg.com%2Fyt%2Fswfbin%2Fwatch_as3-vfl3J-I2Q.swf&has_verified=1COUNTY COURTTop rated as Exceptionally Qualified: Judge Steve Leifman - 54%Judge Andrea Wolfson - 52%Judge Charlie Johnson - 49%Judge Sam Slom - 47% Lowest Percentage of Unqualified votes: Judge Luise Krieger Martin - 5.10%Judge Leifman - 5.35%Judge Slom - 5.41%Judge Johnson - 5.60%Judge Shelly Kravitz - 5.67% Highest Percentage of… [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
As the Court put the point in 1989 in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:17 am
Miller from the U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:17 am
Miller from the U.S. [read post]
4 May 2017, 8:34 am
Miller, Hood, and Cannon as well as Mr. [read post]
2 May 2015, 4:11 am
” Florida v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
Under U.S. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
Allen v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
Stryker Corp. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
In Janus v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am
Louisiana, 14-280 – in which the Court is considering whether Miller v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rodriguez, No. 06-2656 Sentencing courts have discretion to consider items such as fast-track disparity in considering requests for variant sentences premised on disagreements with the manner in which the sentencing guidelines operate, however, they are not obligated to deviate from the guidelines based on those items. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 4:14 am
See Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
Henceforth, Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 8:57 am
From Yelling v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
Court of Appeals fo the 11th Circuit’s rule that reasonable jurists could not debate an issue foreclosed by binding circuit precedent, even when a judge on the panel issued the binding precedent and subsequently stated that the panel’s decision may be erroneous, misapplies the standard articulated by the Supreme Court in Miller-El v. [read post]
