Search for: "Roman v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2022, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Bukharian Jewish Community Center v. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 12:16 am
Ilyin and Others v Ukraine (no. 74852/14): about the Kyiv City State Administration’s refusal to register a community of the Unification Church. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 9:00 am
Due to recent legislative changes around the country following the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 11:32 pm
The slightly postponed Epic Games v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 4:34 pm
Decisions this Week United StatesHiQ Labs v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 12:40 pm
From Belya v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Even as SA regaled the crowd in Rome with dishonest and arrogant claims about the free exercise of Christianity, women and girls in the United States suffered and bled because of SA’s crusade in Dobbs.SA’s keynote on religious liberty was essentially a massive lie. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Despite all that, thanks to a sea change in the economy, the Court’s decision may have only a minor impact on efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
In Federalist No. 2, John Jay, writing of course as Publius, asserted that the Constitution had to be ratified, or else the unity of the United States, such as it was, would be lost. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Consider the now infamous case, United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 6:15 am
Under Secretary of State Nuland on Accelerating Aid to Ukraine and Sanctions Against Russiaby Viola Gienger (@ViolaGienger) (March 9, 2022) Humanitarian Corridors in Ukraine: Impasse, Ploy or Narrow Passage of Hope? [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:33 am
In fact it was always the latter first and foremost, and is so treated in the book; the very office of the Roman praetor was linked to and justified by his legal mandate to promote the bonum commune (common good). [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
In his ruling on A & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2014] EWHC 1364 (Admin) Mr Justice King held that the claimant, whose ordinary/usual residence was in Northern Ireland, was not entitled to access in England abortion services free of charge. (13 May 2014). [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
In Rapp v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:44 am
The Justice Department yesterday announced a task force aimed at identifying ways to protect reproductive rights in the wake of the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Bickel trusted the Court to discern our deepest “fundamental values,” such as a commitment to racial justice that required the invalidation of segregation in Brown v. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 12:58 am
And finally…I In that rather esoteric common law jurisdiction known as the United States of America, the US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed the lower court’s decision that the Universal Life Church has standing to pursue its challenge to a Tennessee law prohibiting persons who have been ordained online from solemnizing marriages: Universal Life Church Monastery Storehouse v Nabors (6th Cir, May 27, 2022). [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 12:50 pm
He writes, echoing Chief Justice Roberts’s opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 11:00 am
So why isn’t it also a candidate to break through the ranks of the “usual suspects, along, of course, with Islamic law and perhaps even the Canon Law of the Roman Catholic Church? [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:07 am
Roman Catholic Bishops of England and Wales issue pastoral letter on the General Election: Scroll down to “Issues on family life”. (15 May 2017). [read post]
