Search for: "Ronan v. Ronan" Results 61 - 80 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
There was a discussion on the Ronan Daly Jermyn website. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:38 am by Liam Thornton
In her judgment, Laffoy J. made extensive reference to the English court decisions in R (Bernard) v Enfield LBC and Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
Saini J has dismissed the claims in libel, slander per se and malicious falsehood in George v Cannell & another. [read post]
9 Nov 2019, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Community Highlights and Recent News ● Global Freedom of Expression experts Dirk Voorhoof and Ronan Ó Fathaigh have published an analysis of the recent ECtHR ruling Szurovecz v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am by INFORRM
There were a handful of resolved cases reported:  Full Fact v The Sun, Clause 1, 06/05/2013; Mr David Murray v Sutton Guardian, Clause 1, 03/05/2013; A woman v The Sun on Sunday, Clause 9, 03/05/2013; and Dr Carol Uren v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 03/05/2013. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
The first amendment combined with the supreme court’s 1964 landmark case of New York Times v Sullivan means that the bar is set very high for celebrities or public figures who want to sue for defamation. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:15 am by INFORRM
There is an Inforrm case comment by Ronan O Fathaigh and Dirk Voorhoof. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Mathew (2002) to Mohammed Abdulla Khan (2017), Shivam Geol, Independent Dosamantes V. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:03 am by Scott Bomboy
However, the Supreme Court in December 1970 decided on a challenge to the law, in Oregon v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:05 am by NCC Staff
Stradley Ronan will also return as the President’s Sponsor for the third consecutive year. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
International – Compagnia Generale Distribuzione s.p.a. v Zorro Productions Inc). [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Sophie Matthiesson and Eric Barendt; The Recognition of a Right of Reply under the European Convention, Ronan Fathaigh. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 3:07 pm
(3) Data retention remains doubtful in terms of fundamental rights compliance: in the ECHR, S & Marper v UK questions mass monitoring of the unconvicted, Copland v UK reiterates that traffic data is covered by Article 8 (as I argue here); the German courts are considering various challenges (summarised by Digital Rights Ireland: 1 | 2), and DRI itself is engaged in a challenge to the Directive. [read post]