Search for: "Rosebud Sioux Tribe" Results 61 - 80 of 93
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2014, 6:16 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
.): 44 Nichols Motion to Dismiss 45 US Response 49 DCT Order Denying Motion to Dismiss An excerpt: Steven Nichols, a non-Indian, was excluded from the Rosebud Sioux Indian Reservation. [read post]
The ACLU filed a lawsuit in March 2013 in federal court on behalf of the Oglala Sioux and the Rosebud Sioux tribes in South Dakota and on behalf of a class of all Indian families living in Rapid City, South Dakota, the state's second largest city. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:37 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Rosebud Sioux Tribe (casino management contract)* United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2014dct.htmlCases featured: Jones v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Rosebud Sioux Tribe (D.S.D.): 1 Habeas Petition 5 DCT Order Denying Habeas Writ The Eighth Circuit denied petitioner’s direct appeal of his federal conviction here. [read post]
The suit, brought on behalf of the Oglala and Rosebud Sioux Indian Tribes and a class of Indian parents, aims to ensure that state courts in South Dakota respect the rights granted to Indian parents by the Constitution's Due Process Clause and the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA). [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 8:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Rosebud Sioux Tribe: Columbe Opening Brief RST Answer Brief Columbe Reply Brief Lower court materials here. [read post]
31 May 2013, 10:20 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
But, because there is no evidence that the Rosebud Sioux Tribe was given proper notice of these termination of parental rights proceedings as required by the Nebraska Indian Child Welfare Act (NICWA), we find that the termination proceedings conducted were invalid and thus that the order of termination in both cases must be vacated. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:43 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of three parents in Pennington County, as well as the Oglala Sioux Tribe and the Rosebud Sioux Tribe, which are federally recognized Indian tribes with reservations in South Dakota. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 1:28 pm by National Indian Law Library
Rosebud Sioux Tribe (jurisdiction)Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:18 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
On South Dakota’s Rosebud Sioux reservation, tribal officials worked with the U.S. attorney’s office to create a diversion program to keep juveniles out of trouble. [read post]
16 May 2012, 10:47 am by brian
See slides from his first days as a young attorney on the Rosebud Sioux Reservation and hear how needing to "learn by doing" led to a guide for all who followed. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 11:11 am by National Indian Law Library
Rosebud Sioux Tribe (exhaustion of tribal court remedies)Big Lagoon Rancheria v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:22 am by Kedar
Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 12:58 pm by David
Rosebud Sioux Tribe (casino management contract)Cahto Tribe of the Laytonville Rancheria v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
Serr.[44]  The child involved in that case, Danette, was born out of wedlock to a non-Indian mother and a father who was a member of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe.[45]  The mother was the sole caregiver and provider for Danette for her early life; and the father paid no child support and very few of Danette’s expenses.[46]  When Danette was about five years old, the mother met and married a man named Greg Serr; and about two years later, they commenced… [read post]