Search for: "Ross v. Consumers Power" Results 61 - 80 of 120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2018, 5:00 am by Hilary Hurd
Former detainees describe being forced to renounce their religious beliefs or consume alcohol and meat, thereby violating their religious practices. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance The ECHR case of Big Brother Watch and Others v UK sheds light on the application of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 to GCHQ investigative measures involving the interception of communications. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance Graham Smith has a piece dealing with the “more ticklish points of interepretation” of the Investigatory Powers Act. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:48 pm by Shu-Yi Oei
Ross Jr. retained investments in a shipping firm he once controlled that has significant business ties to a Russian oligarch subject to American sanctions and President Vladimir V. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
There are pockets that demand different approaches.Jake Linford: Error costs v. administrative costs. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:34 pm by David Kopel
In New England, the Springfield Armory worked with emerging machinists for other consumer products; the exchange of information in this technology network led directly to the Connecticut River Valley becoming a center of American consumer firearms manufacture, and to rapid improvements in the manufacture of many other consumer durables. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Legal Beagle
  In Bartos v Scottish Legal Complaints Commission 2015 SC 690, at its own instance the court raised a question as to the proper approach to certain provisions in the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 2007 (the Act). [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
LTD. v. uCOOL, INC. https://t.co/DyoGX8FYr2 -> Use of photo in blog post is fair use says US CA Katz v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Sup. 2006) (quoting Sosna), aff’d, 841 N.Y.S.2d 469 (N.Y.A.D. 2007); Power v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:16 am by Joy Waltemath
Gomez presents the issue of whether an offer of complete relief on a plaintiff’s claims renders a case moot and therefore beyond the judicial power of Article III—a question the Supreme Court was unable to answer in Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]