Search for: "Rowe v. Superior Court "
Results 61 - 80
of 124
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
(See Ford v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:39 am
Superior Court, the Court of Appeal held that neither exemption applied, and that the names must be disclosed. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 10:39 pm
Ronald Deere was sentenced to die by Judge Fred Metheny of the California Superior Court. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 4:15 am
(Superior Court for the State of California, County of San Francisco) is instructive. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 1:46 pm
In Harper & Row, this was the reason the Supreme Court found that a mere 300 words taken from a book several hundred pages long was not fair use. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 11:07 am
And so the Supreme Court said that while it's not OK to kill the insane, it's perfectly fine to kill crazy people as long as they aren't insane in a particular way.The Court decided Ford v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:41 am
He relied on "the principles laid down in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 12:26 pm
In PHD v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 5:54 am
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Monday, October 1, 2012: California Bans Therapies to ‘Cure’ Gay Minors Romney Campaign Memo Urging Return to Use of Enhanced Interrogation Québec Ct of Appeal: no duty to disclose unfounded allegations of dishonest conduct to potential employer Khadr eligible for parole next summer, lawyers say Supreme Court back on Monday, will hear affirmative action, same-sex marriage and human rights cases BC… [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
S. 82 (1879); and Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:27 am
Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Atkins v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:23 pm
" In Atkins v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:02 am
This concerns firstly the prohibition of ‘incitement to discrimination, hatred or violence on the basis of colour and ethnic origin’ and secondly the ban on the ‘dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority or hatred’. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
On the rare occasions that the UK courts have disagreed with ECtHR case law, the Strasbourg Court has shown itself willing to engage in ‘judicial dialogue’ with the superior courts of the UK. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
And: Weeks’s ruling—the first invocation of the new Racial Justice Act—was the first step in repairing the damage done by one of the Supreme Court’s most notorious holdings: McCleskey v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:45 am
We must relegate McCleskey to the dustbin of history, alongside cases like Dred Scott and Plessy v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:33 am
More on the 25th anniversary of the Supreme Court ruling in McCleskey is also available. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 8:15 pm
The District Court ignored among other things the fact that the Superior Court conducted a face to face colloquy with Mr. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:03 pm
And: William V. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am
In a complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on January 13, 2012, Bostwick alleges that certain SB 94 provisions, “as applied and enforced by the State Bar, violate both the United States and California constitutions. [read post]
