Search for: "Rubenstein v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2012, 3:00 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Rubenstein v HSBC Bank Plc [2012] EWCA Civ 1184 (12 September 2012) NM, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 1182 (12 September 2012) KA (Turkey) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 1183 (12 September 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) General Medical Council v Srinivas [2012] EWHC 2513 (Admin) (11 September 2012) Source: www.bailii.org… [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 3:15 am
Rubenstein, Carlos A. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:50 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:00 am
Political Backing v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 1:07 pm
Div. 1987) (citing Rubenstein v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:13 am
State of Alaska. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:30 am
The case was eventually appealed to the United States Supreme Court which found in Burton v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 1:50 pm
(quoting First State Bank v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:18 pm
United States,... [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 7:08 am
Rubenstein, 2011 U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:46 pm
Besides, as my former colleague Bill Rubenstein has persuasively argued, civil rights plaintiffs often can get important advantages from state courts. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
But not everyone saw the effects of this new technology as benign: some saw the prophesied erosion of state power as an invitation to anarchy, or as opening the door to the very evils that the state power was being deployed to prevent. [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:28 pm
Settlement Funding, LLC v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 4:02 am
This suggests that in such situations the State may attempt to have the case dismissed on the grounds that it immune from suit in federal court for alleged violations of Title VII in view of the rulings by the Supreme Court of the United States in Kimel v Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62 and Alden v Maine, 527 U.S. 706, cases involving employees suing their state employer in federal court for alleged violations of, respectively, the Age Discrimination in… [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 2:49 am
While Rubenstein and Sae Hwan Kim both state that an attorney terminated without cause is entitled to recover in quantum meruit, neither holds that such an attorney is precluded from asserting an account stated claim. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:48 am
The city asked a state Supreme Court judge, and later the Appellate Division, for a stay of arbitration. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
Legis. 18-90 (2010).Rubenstein, David S. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 3:45 am
""However, a law firm's "failure to comply with the rules on retainer agreements (22 NYCRR 1215.1) does not preclude it from suing to recover legal fees for the services it provided" (Miller v Nadler, 60 AD3d 499, 500 [Sup Ct New York County 2009], citing Egnotovich v Katten Muchin Zavis & Roseman LLP, 55 AD3d 462, 464 [1st Dept 2008]; Nicoll & Davis LLP v Ainetchi, 52 AD3d 412 [1st Dept 2008]; Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v… [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:01 am
Seth Rubenstein, PC v. [read post]
