Search for: "Rudolf v. Rudolf"
Results 61 - 80
of 185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2011, 2:44 am
Grasso, P.C., 210 AD2d 671, 673 [1994]; see Mizuno v Fischoff & Assoc., 82 AD3d 849, 850 [2011]; Leach v Bailly, 57 AD3d 1286, 1289 [2008]; but see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 444 n 3 [2007]). [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:16 pm
Plaintiff could not establish the important but/for causation - that, but for the attorney's negligence the plaintiff would have prevailed in the underlying lawsuit.As the Court noted:To establish the element of causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages but for the attorney's negligence (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Saver, 8 NY3d at 442; Kluczka v… [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:38 am
With respect to the services he provided in Weinberg v Sultan, plaintiff simply asserted that defendant and her daughter were unable to provide facts concerning the closing, but made no showing that his investigation of the case, preparation of the complaint, and conduct of the litigation met the standard of “ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker, &… [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 3:44 am
Plaintiff’s alleged damages, as they relate to legal expenses defending the specific performance action, may be found to be proximately related to defendant’s negligent advice related to the issue of the contingency clause (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 443). [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 4:14 am
Accordingly, plaintiffs have no cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice as they cannot demonstrate that defendants were negligent in their representation, or that such negligence proximately caused the alleged damages (see Rudolf v Shayne, supra; Weil v Fashion Boutique, supra). [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:58 pm
A Human Rights-Based Comment on the Proposed WHO Treaty on Pandemic Preparedness and Response FOCUS – China and International Law Kerstin von der Decken, Introduction Björn Ahl, China’s Perspectives on Public International Law: Selective Adaptation of International Treaties and the Community of Common Destiny Concept Congyan Cai, China and International Security: How Law and Politics Work Sarah Biddulph, The Chinese Approach to Human Rights Yuhong Zhao, The Chinese Approach to… [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 3:54 am
Dismissal of the legal malpractice counterclaim was warranted because defendant failed to adequately plead proximate causation (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:14 am
"The complaint failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice because the plaintiff neglected to plead that she would have prevailed in the underlying action, commenced in the Supreme Court, New York County, but for the defendants' alleged malpractice in failing to file certain motions and appeal from certain orders issued in that action (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442; Kuzmin v… [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:15 am
(trade mark law: dirty tricks and acquiescence in honest use); Case C-162/10 Phonographic Performance (Ireland) Ltd v Ireland and Others (communication of a work to the public, via a hotel bedroom)Case C‑145/10 Eva-Maria Painer v Standard VerlagsGmbH, Axel Springer AG, Süddeutsche Zeitung GmbH, SPIEGEL-Verlag Rudolf AUGSTEIN GmbH & Co KG and Verlag M. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 1:10 am
Judgment, U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:40 am
Spiegel v Rowland, 552 US 1257; see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442; McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301-302; Gioeli v Vlachos, 89 AD3d 984; Dempster v Liotti, 86 AD3d 169, 176). [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:09 am
Puma AG Rudolf Dassler Sport, CV09-03022 GAF (C.D. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 6:18 am
In Shareholder Representative Services LLC v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 10:31 am
Ferme Rudolf Hefti Inc. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 5:18 am
Even accepting plaintiff’s allegations as true, the complaint contains no nonconclusory allegations suggesting that any negligence by defendants in their handling of the medical malpractice trial was the “but for” cause of plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]). [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 5:04 am
Gopstein v Bellinson Law, LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 33476(U) October 4, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 159060/2022 Judge: Mary V. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:41 pm
Rudolf Wolff & Co., 484 U. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:24 pm
Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836 [2007]; Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438 [2007]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008 [1996]; Carmel v Lunney, 70 NY2d 169 [1987]). [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 2:51 am
In order to prevail in an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must establish that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, and that the breach of this duty proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442). [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 6:12 am
Edelman v Poster, 72 AD3d 182 [2010]). [read post]
