Search for: "Rule v. Tobin" Results 61 - 80 of 123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2023, 9:11 am by Tobin Admin
The appellant and the appellee’s parents appealed from the trial court’s rulings, and the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s orders granting the appellee’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement and the order denying her parents’ motion for summary judgment on the appellant’s vicarious liability claims. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 1:17 pm by Tobin Admin
Here, it also wasn’t entirely clear how the Housing Authority was insured or whether any insurance was linked to the State, and there was no evidence that its employees were connected to the State via the merit system, their retirement plans, or any other rules affecting State workers. [read post]
3 May 2013, 4:00 am by Donald Tobin
Donald Tobin With the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Mayo Foundation for Education and Research v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 4:00 am by Donald Tobin
Donald Tobin With the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Mayo Foundation for Education and Research v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
 As for the others, Tobin receives credit for offering Calabresi “liberal insights,” as well as for teaching him that what “might be true in theory . . . doesn’t work in practice” (a lesson that Calabresi brought from Tobin’s macroeconomic terrain into the realm of microeconomics) (OI, v.1, 170-71). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:41 pm by Colin O'Keefe
For the second day in a row, we have a landmark ruling at the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm by Tommy Tobin
The three judge DeCoster appeals panel issued a three-opinion ruling, with the majority advancing a concept of responsible corporate officer liability arising from the FDCA and the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 8:06 am by Tobin Admin
During the company’s Rule 30(b)(6) deposition—for which it designated its president–the evasion and misleading continued. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Schiro No. 18-0278 (Tex. 2019) (attorney fee award based on fee-shifting statute reversed and remanded for redetermination).Cognate Place Name   ROHRMOOS VENTURE, ERIC LANGFORD, DAN BASSO, AND TOBIN GROVE, Petitioners,v.UTSW DVA HEALTHCARE, LLP, Respondent. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 1:35 am by J.W. Verret
” This project is inspired by the DC Circuit’s opinion in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:35 pm by Colin O'Keefe
We also have some SCOTUS talk on LXBN TV as Antoinette Konski joins us to talk Mayo v. [read post]