Search for: "Russell v. District of Columbia" Results 61 - 80 of 183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm by John Ehrett
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
For The Economist, Steven Mazie writes that this “is the case gun-rights advocates have been waiting for since 2008, when the Supreme Court first recognised an individual right to own a gun for self-defence” in District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 8:01 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit allowed the lawsuit to go forward. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 8:44 am by Lyle Denniston
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to succeed Justice Scalia, Senate Republican leaders have vowed to take no formal action on that nomination until after the presidential election on November 8. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:57 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit announced on Friday that it would hold all oral arguments in September and October remotely because of the pandemic “and the latest public health guidance. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am by John Elwood
Johns River Water Management District, Dolan v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
[Akin Gump and Howe & Russell represent the petitioner] Opinion below (Supreme Court of Washington) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amici curiae of Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia, et al. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Cacace involved the latest attempt to get the Court to explore whether its 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm by Mark Walsh
” He noted that 41 states, two U.S. territories, and the District of Columbia had joined an amicus brief on South Dakota’s side asking the court to reject the Quill test. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:28 am by Maureen Johnston
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am by Maureen Johnston
City and County of San Francisco 14-704 Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia’s invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upholding the Obama administration’s “net neutrality” rules, which have since been rolled back under the Trump administration. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:19 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:35 am by Lyle Denniston
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit does with a case it is now reviewing en banc. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 7:05 am by Aurora Barnes
Wayfair, Inc. 17-494 Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 10:36 am
The Akin-only cases are Lopez-Torres (NY elections; successfully argued by N.Y. partner Andy Rossman); Clintwood Elkhorn (Export Clause; Pattie Millett argued - pending); Heller (gun rights; co-counsel to the District of Columbia, and Walter Dellinger argued - pending); and APCC Services (standing; we are lead counsel, and Carter Phillips will argue in April). [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:00 am by Maureen Johnston
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]