Search for: "Ruth v. Ruth"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,742
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2023, 11:28 am
Use “winks and nods,” as the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg put it. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:34 pm
Bollinger (2003) and Fisher v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
The majority effectively, though not explicitly, overruled its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
In Washington v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm
The post Justice Stevens's Papers Reveal How The Fortune Cookies Were Baked In <I>Lawrence v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 4:21 pm
Brod & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 4:59 am
In 2003 in Grutter v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 5:04 am
In Escobar v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:13 am
It animated his final Religion Clauses opinion, a 2022 dissent in Carson v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 12:00 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who enjoyed an across-the-aisle friendship over many years together on the Court (even if it didn’t manifest itself in their votes or opinions). [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:21 pm
See Chafin v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:07 pm
Saldivar v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:05 pm
Hernandez v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 11:02 am
But some state courts have held the practice is unconstitutional, and a host of prominent jurists, including Justices Antonin Scalia, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Clarence Thomas, have criticized the practice. [read post]
24 May 2023, 5:01 am
From H.B. v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:38 pm
No. 1 v United Fire & Cas. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:00 am
Two major projects of legal feminism in the United States—women’s suffrage as achieved by the Nineteenth Amendment—and equal protection of the laws without sex discrimination as achieved by Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s 1970s litigation strategy—tried to end legal patriarchy. [read post]
10 May 2023, 12:35 pm
.; Roberts, Julian V., editor. [read post]
8 May 2023, 6:30 am
Morrison and the states in Castle Rock v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:30 am
That women are the peculiar bearers of America’s constitutional failings seems obvious after Dobbs v. [read post]
