Search for: "S AND S CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. Reliance Ins. Co." Results 61 - 74 of 74
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2010, 3:58 am
It is unclear at this time how many of the two-member Board rulings not already challenged in the appellate courts can or will be contested and how many may now be moot.Hardt v Reliance Standard Life Ins Co (Dkt No 09-448). [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
That's because, the statute's exception involves not just a misrepresentation to an agency - but intent, materiality and reliance as well. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
The Legal Aid Society; Real Estate Board of New York; New York State Tenants & Neighbors Coalition, Inc. et al.; Community Housing Improvement Program of New York Inc. et al.; Maria del Carmen Arroyo et al.; Rent Stabilization Association of New York City, Inc.; Office of Manhattan Borough President; Urban Justice Center; Mitchell-Lama Residents Coalition, amici curiae. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
The Board also adopted the judges' finding that a Gissel bargaining order was necessary and warranted under NLRB v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:33 pm by Chip Merlin
However, the contractor may discuss or explain a bid for construction or repair of covered property with the residential property owner who has suffered loss or damage covered by a property insurance policy, or the insurer of such property, if the contractor is doing so for the usual and customary fees applicable to the work to be performed as stated in the contract between the contractor and the insured. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:42 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
  Congress introduced this limber possibility in the American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act (AC21), S.2045 , at a time when the legacy agency, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), still held sway over immigration-benefits decisions. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
These shifts are significant in that they pull the software liability discussion in two directions, compelling us to start holding vendors at least partially accountable for poor software development practices but also complicating any attempt to construct a coherent liability regime. [read post]