Search for: "S. R. V." Results 61 - 80 of 124,400
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
L’infraction dont l’appelant a été reconnu coupable est celle d’avoir omis, sans excuse raisonnable, de s’arrêter et de donner ses nom et adresse après que le véhicule qu’il conduisait eut été impliqué dans un accident avec un autre véhicule. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
” This, of course, comes in the wake of the decision in R (on the Application of TTT) v Michaela School [2024] EWHC 843 (Admin), on which we published a critical guest post by Russell Sandberg, here. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
It’s easy to dismiss complaints about a pro-contact culture by saying ‘well, it’s just the law’. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am by Keith Mallinson
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:11 am by Michael Oykhman
Examples of acts which have, in the past, met the actus reus standard for a section 86 offence include: Storing a firearm in a glovebox (see: R v Patrick, 2007 CanLII 7579 (ONSC)) Storing a firearm in a dresser (see: R v McDonald, 2016 BCSC 1648 (CanLII)) Storing a firearm by a furnace (see: R v Roussel, 2014 ABQB 202 (CanLII)) The Guilty Mind (Mens Rea) The mens rea or the guilty mind speaks to the accused’s degree of intent… [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 3:30 am by Jon Choi
Brooks and Gamage’s work is especially timely given that the Supreme Court will rule on Moore v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am by Michael Oykhman
Voyeurism is covered under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada (the “Code”). [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Michael Oykhman
Child pornography is addressed under section 163.1 (1) of the Criminal Code of Canada (the “Code”). [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:27 am by Michael Oykhman
This was discussed in the case of R v McSween (2020), ONCA 343 (CanLII). [read post]
  On Tuesday I attended a hearing called by the US Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions to examine women’s freedoms, focusing on access to abortions across the United States two years after the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:10 am by Dylan Gibbs
He covered topics like judicial vacancies, the need for Jordan timelines, and disinformation circulated about the Court’s R v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:47 am by Michael Oykhman
The case of R v ML, 2021 NBCA 27 also stated that the actus reus is made out where a “reasonable person aware of the circumstances would perceive the words as a threat of death or bodily harm”. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Even more directly relevant, Justice Alito's concurrence in the judgment in Shurtleff v. [read post]