Search for: "S. R. V. v. J. S. B." Results 61 - 80 of 4,532
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2023, 12:24 pm by Administrator
 27, per LeBel J.; see also Tercon Contractors Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by INFORRM
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 6:34 pm
Este encuentro es un homenaje a la idea fundadora del Comandante en Jefe Fidel Castro, a su incansable búsqueda del mejor de los caminos hacia la emancipación humana y la supervivencia de nuestra especie, a la que el capitalismo neoliberal empuja irracionalmente hacia su extinción. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Abdullahi, 2023 SCC 19, at para. 33; R. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm by Ilana Korchia
In response to this investigation, Scenic Fruit Company of Gresham, Oregon voluntarily recalled frozen, organic strawberries sold to Costco, Trader Joe’s, Aldi, KeHE, Vital Choice Seafood, and PCC Community Markets in certain states. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
       (b)  Promoting responsible innovation, competition, and collaboration will allow the United States to lead in AI and unlock the technology’s potential to solve some of society’s most difficult challenges. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am by INFORRM
In Depp II v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2020] EWHC 2911 (QB) Nicol J outlined that where there is an allegation of serious criminality, clear evidence is required. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
B and J were councillors of the Piikani Nation. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 12:42 pm by Giles Peaker
All allocation policies are unequal and as observed by Garnham J in R v XC Southwark (2017) EWHC 736 (Admin): “Every tweak to the scheme to benefit one individual or one class of applicant is likely to have an adverse effect on another…”. [read post]