Search for: "S. R.C. T." Results 61 - 80 of 520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2020, 6:49 am by MBettman
”) R.C. 5301.25(A) (“All deeds . . . and instruments of writing properly executed for the conveyance or encumbrance of lands . . . shall be recorded in the office of the county recorder . . . . [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 9:35 am by MBettman
The issue in the case is how a child’s last name is determined when the parents aren’t married and disagree about it. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 5:25 am by MBettman
R.C. 2929.19(B)(5) (Before imposing financial sanctions under R.C. 2929.18, the trial court is required to consider the felony offender’s present and future ability to pay the sanction.) [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 10:41 am by MBettman
Merit Decision Jones’ Position R.C. 955.22’s dangerous dog laws do not apply to a person unless that person’s dog has previously been declared to be a dangerous dog by the state as set forth in R.C. 955.222, or by a judge at an earlier proceeding for failure to confine that dog. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:09 am by MBettman
”) R.C. 5301.25(A) (“All deeds . . . and instruments of writing properly executed for the conveyance or encumbrance of lands . . . shall be recorded in the office of the county recorder . . . . [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:08 am by MBettman
Third, a court must determine whether any defense within R.C. 2744.03 is applicable to restore the political subdivision’s immunity.) [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 5:07 am by MBettman
State’s Propositions of Law Accepted for Review Proposition 1 Involuntary Manslaughter with a child endangering predicate in violation of R.C. 2903.04 (A) is not the same offense for double jeopardy purposes as Aggravated Murder in violation of R.C. 2901.01(C) or Murder with a Felonious Assault predicate in violation of R.C. 2903.02(B) under the Blockburger “same offense” test. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:33 am by MBettman
”) R.C. 2903.13(A) (“No person shall knowingly cause or attempt to cause physical harm to another or to another’s unborn. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 9:38 am by MBettman
Chief Justice O’Connor harshly disagreed with Kennedy’s interpretation of R.C. 2953.21(A)(1). [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:26 pm
  Appellant's counsel takes that academic argument and turns it into a concrete legal one.But the Court of Appeal says that you can lead an appellate tribunal to water, but you can't make it drink. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:58 am by MBettman
The dissent would find that that R.C. 9.75 is not a valid exercise of the legislature’s authority under Article II, Section 34 and that it violates Cleveland’s home rule authority. [read post]