Search for: "S. et al v. City of New York et al"
Results 61 - 80
of 915
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Following administrative review, PERB concluded that it was constrained to follow Matter of City of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Following administrative review, PERB concluded that it was constrained to follow Matter of City of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Shapiro, appellant, v State of New York, et al., respondents. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Shapiro, appellant, v State of New York, et al., respondents. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 6:52 am
Clover Communities Beavercreek, LLC et al v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am
Index No. 160234/22 Appeal No. 291 Case No. 2023-00232 [*1]MargaretAnn Bianculli etc. et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v The City of New York Office of Labor Relations et al., Defendants-Appellants. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am
Index No. 160234/22 Appeal No. 291 Case No. 2023-00232 [*1]MargaretAnn Bianculli etc. et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v The City of New York Office of Labor Relations et al., Defendants-Appellants. [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:00 am
Lynch, et al., Respondents-Appellants, v City of New York, et al., Appellants-Respondents:At issue here is whether Tier 3 police officers in the New York City Police Pension Fund (PPF) who otherwise might be eligible for retirement credit under the statutory provisions discussed in the decision may use those provisions to apply prior non-police service toward their retirement eligibility. [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:00 am
Lynch, et al., Respondents-Appellants, v City of New York, et al., Appellants-Respondents:At issue here is whether Tier 3 police officers in the New York City Police Pension Fund (PPF) who otherwise might be eligible for retirement credit under the statutory provisions discussed in the decision may use those provisions to apply prior non-police service toward their retirement eligibility. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Jordan Notice of Dismissal Following Settlement (April 24, 2023) Trump Request for Bill of Particulars (April 27, 2023) Trump Notice of Removal (May 4, 2023) Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, Response to Trump’s Request for a Bill of Particulars (May 16, 2023) Mark Pomerantz, Opening Statement in Congressional Deposition (May 12, 2023) Model New York jury instructions for falsifying business records (no date) Photo credit: Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg… [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:56 pm
The Supreme Court has strengthened the Second Amendment in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:28 am
(Weir) and Weir & Associates (Weir Associates), stemming from their alleged failure to file a timely notice of claim concerning a pending action commenced by plaintiff in Supreme Court, New York County, entitled Siegel v City of New York, et al., Index No. 156682/2018 (the pending action). [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
FORD LILLIAN WAN, JJ. 2019-14251 (Index No. 608005/19) [*1]In the Matter of Town of Hempstead, petitioner, vNew York State Division of Human Rights, et al., respondents. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
FORD LILLIAN WAN, JJ. 2019-14251 (Index No. 608005/19) [*1]In the Matter of Town of Hempstead, petitioner, vNew York State Division of Human Rights, et al., respondents. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
Oklahoma; Certificate of Appealability) In re Gold King Mine Release in San Juan County, Colorado, on August 5, 2015 (CERCLA; Natural Resource Damages) Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians, et al. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:40 pm
Julien Jin, et al. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 1:34 pm
Yunpeng Bai, et al. and United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 6:10 am
Food and Drug Administration, et al. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 6:10 am
Food and Drug Administration, et al. [read post]