Search for: "S. v. D."
Results 61 - 80
of 68,664
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2015, 5:23 pm
Cir. 2014) (citingNovo Nordisk A/S v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 10:02 am
Brian D. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 9:00 pm
Dans les décisions G2/12 et G2/13, la Grande Chambre de recours avait jugé que si la CBE interdisait clairement de breveter des procédés essentiellement biologiques d'obtention de végétaux et d'animaux, les végétaux et animaux obtenus par des procédés essentiellement biologiques n'étaient quant à eux pas exclus de la… [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:01 am
Salford City Council v Mullen: Hounslow London Borough Council v Hall; Leeds City Council v Hall; Birmingham City Council v Frisby; Manchester City Council v Mushin (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 336; [2010] WLR (D) 91 ”Guidance for county courts hearing applications for possession orders by local authority landlords of non-secure tenancies where the occupier, being an… [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 9:25 am
Dennis Nolan sends word of Tewolde v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 2:45 pm
ROGERS, d/b/a MIKE’S PC PARTS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:24 am
In Giles v Bravo, 2012 WL 704745 (D. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
(People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:24 am
R v G; R v J [2009] UKHL 13; [2009] WLR (D) 80 “To rely on the defence in s 58(3) of the Terrorism Act 2000 a defendant had to show an objectively ‘reasonable excuse’ for his action or possession and a ruling that neither a desire to ‘wind up’ prison officers nor mental illness could [...] [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 2:18 am
R v JTB (on appeal from R v T) [2009] UKHL 20; [2009] WLR(D) 140 “S 34 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 abolished the defence as well as the presumption of doli incapax. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 8:46 pm
Posted by D. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 7:16 am
REBECCA S. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 10:45 am
G v HM Treasury; A and others v Same [2008] EWCA Civ 1187; [2008] WLR (D) 339 “The Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2006 was lawful and validly made under s 1 of the United Nations Act 1946 provided certain words were severed from art 4(2) so that it required the Treasury to show that it had reasonable grounds for suspecting that the person designated was involved in committing or facilitating terrorism and not merely might be such a person. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:14 am
Muntjan, appellant, against Frank D. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 1:25 pm
Knight’s home was sold via a foreclosure sale by Kristine D. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 7:26 am
On November 27, 2017, the circuit court dismissed appellant’s, Irene D. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:51 am
Mehta has an interesting post about the appeal of Texas v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 12:31 am
Super Duck Tours, LLC, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2007 WL 4465464 (D. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:17 am
A v A [2012] EWCA Civ 1396; [2012] WLR (D) 297 “Where children who had been born in England had been forcibly removed to another country and retained there by one parent against the wish of the other, that could not change the children’s place of habitual residence from England to the other country. [read post]
