Search for: "SB v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2011, 8:15 am
United States involving Arizona's controversial immigration statute SB 1070. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 3:31 pm
That is, until the Court of Appeal came down with its decision in the case of SB Liberty, LLC, v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 4:05 am
Supreme Court overrules Roe v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
In National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:50 pm
In State of Texas v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:37 am
In light of the Supreme Court ruling in Arizona v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
United States [docket; cert. petition, PDF] to determine whether Arizona's controversial immigration law [SB 1070 materials; JURIST news archive] is preempted by federal law. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:05 am
In Van Garderen v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 8:29 am
The AFP v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:25 am
” Lawyers v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 9:22 am
by Peter Spiro The Supreme Court announced a grant this morning in the SB 1070 case. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:45 pm
The Supreme Court announced that principle in 1997, in Printz v. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 9:49 am
Teamey, and this proposed bill (SB 671) we have the beginnings of some interesting conversations, among government lawyers, citizens, and possibly, in time, the state bar. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 10:25 am
In Miami Herald v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 11:45 am
We will provide a full report on the decision in Arizona v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 7:19 am
The Phoenix City Council, however, made the decision in May 2010 to stay neutral in the legal battle between the State of Arizona and the federal government over SB 1070. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
The Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
In Royce v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 9:17 am
On 6 August a lawsuit was commenced in Los Angeles County Superior Court challenging SB 826 ( Robin Crest, et al. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 1:42 pm
Status Spencer v. [read post]