Search for: "SEC v. Provident Securities, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 1,167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” But the Commission also made clear that the SEC’s “broad discretion to require disclosure provides necessary latitude to expand or contract disclosure rules in light of changes in the relevant context in which securities issuers conduct their business. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:36 am by Arina Shulga
   Some legal practitioners adopted a conservative attitude trying to fit the tokens of their clients within the tests provided by the 1946 SEC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 9:14 am by Unknown
Bittrex also contends the SEC lacks the “clear congressional authorization” necessary to apply the securities laws to crypto tokens under the Supreme Court’s “major questions” doctrine (SEC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 10:02 am by Justin Bagdady
”  Brenner added that this provision could thus “fill a gap” caused by the Supreme Court’s decision in Janus Capital Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:05 pm by Christopher J. Hubbert
In addition, the SEC took the position that the BIAs are notes under the four-part test articulated in Reves v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 10:23 am by Jim Kramer
”  The SEC asserted that this rule, Exchange Act Rule 21F-2(b)(1), is “entitled to deference” under Chevron, USA, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Cir. 1976) (noncompliance with SEC Rules provides the basis for a private cause of action); Dale v. [read post]