Search for: "SIMMONS v. ADES"
Results 61 - 80
of 157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Murphy v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 2:35 am
Simmons (1965) 379 U.S. 497[4] and Veix v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:22 am
Miller v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 6:08 am
Simmons-Harris. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 8:31 pm
The Court in Carter v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 7:15 am
See, e.g., Cord v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 8:00 pm
Simmons v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:49 pm
" Actual harm to the child need not result for criminal liability; it is "sufficient that the defendant act in a manner which is likely to result in harm to the child, knowing of the likelihood of such harm coming to the child" (People v Simmons, 92 NY2d 829, 830 [emphasis added]). [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:50 am
George Moore added that preliminary opinions can also be helpful and help to focus the issues at trial but they must be made available well in advance.In relation to venues for litigation from a life sciences perspective, George Moore noted that the preferred venue for revocation actions across Europe is in fact the EPO as businesses want cheap, efficient and reliable systems and the EPO is the best on offer, so patent litigators should not lose sight of this. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 11:55 am
Here is the abstract: When the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Roper v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In Boyce v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:26 am
Knoff et al. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:53 am
Kent v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005), holding death sentences for juveniles violated the Eighth Amendment; Miller v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 8:05 am
New York and Wickard v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 3:05 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
See also Roper v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
(Simmons v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
It’s time for the sixth volume of Retromark, Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons’ rundown of notable trade mark cases over the past six months. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
(Porter v. [read post]