Search for: "SO CAL INSTITUTE OF LAW V. THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 61 - 80
of 112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
Standard Oil of California, 332 U.S. 301, 314 (1947). [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:11 am
Cal.) did the right thing when he struck down California’s Proposition 8. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 2:50 pm
By taking a mostly hands-off approach and deferring to state law and the institutions’ rules—with the exception of the prohibitions described above—the NCAA has created a lack of uniformity from state to state, and between instituti [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm
Hall, 7 Cal. 1 (1857).) [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
Right of Publicity WorkshopYale Law SchoolInformation Society ProjectAbrams Institute for Freedom of Expression Chatham House rules apparently allow me to disclose my own participation, but not that of others, so I’ll just take some notes on whatever catches my ear. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:47 am
For example, in a 1999 decision applying California law, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that directors are immune from claims of ordinary negligence brought by the FDIC when they have acted in good faith and on an informed basis. [12] Similarly, in the first court decision rendered in the recent wave of litigation, a federal court in California followed the same reasoning and held that the former directors of a credit union could not be held liable for… [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
Passed the Bar-nacle Exam, have ye? [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
Passed the Bar-nacle Exam, have ye? [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 5:45 pm
Superior Court (1985) 39 Cal.3d 740 and County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:48 am
Buzz Photo v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 12:13 pm
Co. of the State of Pennsylvania, S153852 (Cal. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
In several major cities and counties, in some territories, perhaps in the whole state of California, and to a small extent in Minnesota, private businesses may not discriminate against patrons based on certain of their political activities. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:00 am
Bramalea California, Inc. (2001)26 Cal.4th 1, 4. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
In the California Marriage Cases, 183 P.3d 384 (Cal. 2008), Minter prioritized the sex discrimination argument, but his co-counsel Terry Stewart believed that it would not win the case—and she was right. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am
State, 281 Cal. [read post]
27 May 2009, 8:13 am
” (Bixby v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
In Rumsfeld v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm
(I discuss elsewhere whether such laws, if enacted on the state level, would be barred by 47 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
Gibbs, who was admitted to the California State Bar in 2007, and who billed himself as "Of Counsel" to Prenda Law Inc. [read post]
