Search for: "SOAP v. STATE" Results 61 - 80 of 251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2015, 2:54 am
This case is Kelly-Brown v Winfrey, No. 11 cv 7875 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 7:35 pm by Drew Falkenstein
The Hawaii State Department of Health is investigating 14 cases of Salmonella infection (salmonellosis) on Oahu. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
§1064(3)).With arbitrary or fanciful marks, the word used as trade mark has its own meaning and it therefore has its own place in language (the Ninth Cirucit in this case used the example of the trade mark IVORY, which is a trade mark for soap but also is the material of the tusks of elephants Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:55 pm by PaulKostro
Div. 2006) (stating “a parent cannot bargain away a child’s right to support because the right to support belongs to the child, not the parent”); Patetta v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 7:22 pm by Patti Waller
  One patient reported consuming raw oysters from an out-of-state establishment. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Gray goods, or parallel imports of genuine goods, refer to a fact pattern in which someone other that the designated exclusive United States importer buys genuine trademarked goods outside the United States and imports them for sale into the United States in competition with the exclusive United States importer.[4] While the terms, "gray goods" and "parallel imports," are often used interchangeably, opponents of parallel imports… [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:06 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Lyle Denniston at SCOTUSblog has this preview of argument in a "legal soap opera" that actually has some interesting issues regarding relations between state and federal courts. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:45 pm by Unknown
Border are Humane and Effective (RI Blog, Sept. 2019) [text]Federal Court Rules Detained Immigrant Children Must Receive Clean Water, Edible Food, and Soap (Immigration Impact Blog, Aug. 2019) [text]Former IJs File Amicus Brief in Padilla v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 2:29 pm by Matt Murphy
” That’s the first line from Justice Kennedy’s plurality opinion in United States v. [read post]