Search for: "SPRINKLE v STATE"
Results 61 - 80
of 153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2016, 9:26 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 4:26 am
My impression is that, at least in the United States, it’s common for authors to make representations about custom on the basis of even just a handful of citations to American and British authority and, in the case of the ambitious, a sprinkling of additional references to French and German practice. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
The AG’s hypothetical complaint would have been based on the state DTPA, so a four part test from Singh v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
Brown v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
Brown v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 8:20 am
John Fund to overrule Basic v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 7:04 am
If other State law requires the information to appear in purple ink sprinkled with glitter, you can furnish the information electronically only if you can assure that it appear to the recipient in purple sprinkled with glitter. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:30 am
The court’s decision in Elkind v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:11 am
That’s the conclusion of the United States Court of Appeals in upholding the FTC’s ruling. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 6:28 am
In Forcellati v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
The Forensics of Verbal Fillers Broadly stated, speakers tend to use the verbal fillers uh and um when something has interrupted the enormously complicated task of speech production. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 5:04 am
Riegel v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 10:09 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 10:15 am
Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 10:25 am
In PhoneDog v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Department of Transportation v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:24 pm
United States. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:11 am
The accused was then charged with having breached the Small Birds Act, s.2 of which states:2. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
In Graham v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:16 pm
Brown v. [read post]