Search for: "STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE v. District Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 87
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
Ultimately the Court of Appeals considered the matter in terms of a court's authority to overturn or modify an administrative disciplinary decision or a disciplinary penalty imposed on a worker [Kelly v Safir, 96 N.Y.2d 32].The Court of Appeals, ruled:1. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:57 am
Dept of Revenue: Bruce A. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:29 am
Supreme Court Decision, Lingle v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, 105 Cal. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 12:27 pm
District Court to declare that the laws are unconsitutional, and they want to bar the state government from continuing its exclusion of all other same-sex couples in the same situation.Section 3 of the federal DOMA (codified at 1 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 11:47 am
Plaintiffs move for a preliminary injunction, but the district court denies it, holding that the public schools were making the best of a bad situation. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
Becton, Dickinson and Co (case no. 2009-1008) (Patently-O) District Court N D Ohio: Amended pleading adding a new party relates back to the original filing date for purposes of first-to-file venue rule: Horton Archery LLC v American Hunting Innovations LLC et al (Docket Report) District Court M D Florida: ITC finding of noninfringement warrants summary judgement of noninfringement in parallel lawsuit: Solomon Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:31 pm
Clark County Public Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 3:19 pm
The State of Wyoming, Dept. of Revenue Citation: 2009 WY 139 Docket Number: S-08-0098 W.R.A.P. 12.09(b) Certification from the District Court of Sublette County, Honorable Norman E. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
However, when this duty is neglected, various defendants arise, including school districts, sports leagues, coaches, and even teammates. [41] In Benejam v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 9:20 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 7:46 pm
In Florida Department of Revenue v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 12:46 am
On Wednesday, March 26, 2008, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Florida Dept. of Revenue v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:29 am
A9959
Abbate -- Provides for special accidental death benefits for district attorney investigator members Same as S 6924 BLURB : Ge [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:32 am
DNA samples; offenders Last Act: 03/03/08 reference changed to codesA10118
Cusick -- Provides for family members of a crime victim and interested parties to make statements to members of the parole board Same as S 6825-A BLURB : CP L. fam and int pty state to p Last Act: 03/03/08 referred to codesA10122
Eddington (MS) -- Enables school districts to be reimbursed for the expense of disseminating sex offender information No Same as BLURB : Pen L. school… [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:49 am
No. 07-312, Florida Dept. of Revenue v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 8:28 pm
In reaching its decision, the Court refused to adopt a per se rule that Congress cannot amend or suspend prior legislation through appropriations riders, stating: “While the district court expressed the view that it was unwilling to see the Lanham Act punctuated by the types of exceptions that characterize such complex bodies of law as the Internal Revenue Code, the wisdom of tradeoffs between simplicity… [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:20 am
Illinois Revenue Dept. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
The state court's resolution of this claim represents an unreasonable application of Supreme Court Confrontation Clause jurisprudence, most notably Davis v. [read post]
