Search for: "STATE EMPLOYEES v. Personnel Bd."
Results 61 - 74
of 74
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2010, 8:51 am
State, Dep’t of Envtl. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 4:47 am
" Here, said the court, CSEA established that it pursued the avenues available to assist Delsante in her grievance but because of her probationary status, the options were limited pursuant to the CSEA Collective Bargaining Agreement Article §33.1 which specifically states "[t]he disciplinary procedure provided herein is not applicable to review the removal of an employee from a probationary appointment".Significantly, CSEA demonstrated that its representative… [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 3:05 am
PERB reverts to its earlier “past-practice” analysis in determining “unit work”Matter of Manhasset Union Free School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 6:23 am
State Personnel Bd., 2009 Cal. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 4:10 am
Employee cannot be found guilty of misconduct not alleged in the disciplinary charges filed against the employeeMayo v Personnel Review Bd. of the Health & Hosps. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 4:21 am
PERB reverts to its earlier "past-practice" analysis in determining "unit work"Matter of Manhasset Union Free School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 9:02 pm
The case is State Bd. of Chiropractic v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 1:27 am
New Windsor court officers Last Act: 01/20/09 referred to codesA2535
Calhoun (MS) -- Allows juvenile offenders be prosecuted as an adult for certain felony gun possession offenses No Same asBLURB : Pen L. jo;adult;felony Last Act: 01/20/09 referred to codesA2538
Colton (MS) -- Allows certain members employed by division of parole to retire without reduction of benefits at 55 or older upon completing 25 or more years of service No Same asBLURB : R & SS. parole… [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Personnel Bd. of Jefferson County, Ala., No. 08-488*Title VII/ (1) Can a court-appointed receiver be sued as an employer under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for retaliatory employment decisions made during his receivership? [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:27 pm
Bd. , No. 073745 In a claim for violation of the Hatch Act which prohibits state or local officer or employee from being a candidate for elective office, grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant-Merit Systems Protection Board is affirmed over claims that: 1) the district court erred in concluding that Board did not abuse its discretion in determining that plaintiff's violation of the Hatch Act, regulating the political activity of state… [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 11:47 am
Personnel Bd. of Jefferson County, Ala., No. 08-488Title VII/ (1) Can a court-appointed receiver be sued as an employer under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for retaliatory employment decisions made during his receivership? [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:59 pm
In Sims v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 2:21 pm
Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Neb. v. [read post]
