Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF C. C."
Results 61 - 80
of 27,465
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2011, 4:45 am
When State Courts Meet Padilla: A Concerted Effort is Needed to Bring State Courts Up to Speed on Crime-Based Immigration Law Provisions by by César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández Capital University Law School Loyola Journal of Public Interest Law, Vol. 12,... [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 1:44 am
Don C. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
No Private Benefit Provision of 501(c)(3) Museums While § 501(c)(3) does not specifically mention private benefits restrictions,[16] it is found in the Treasury Regulation § 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii), which prohibits an organization from operating “for the benefit of private interests such as designated individuals, the creator or his family, shareholders of the organization, or persons controlled, directly or indirectly, by such private… [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 1:57 pm
Professor Steven Solomon has raised an interesting issues concerning the ABA Council's proposal on Standard 303(c). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 9:39 am
As reported in today's Daily Tax Report, IRS EO Director, Lois Lerner, stated in a July 17th letter to an organization raising concerns about the political campaign activities of 501(c)(4) organizations: The IRS is aware of the current public interest... [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:55 am
I believe this means falling within the 1-2% range that is common in Europe for those EU Member States that have mandated some form of payment which would ideally be implemented once the full scope of the Bill C-11 regulatory model is fully developed, not on an interim basis as currently envisioned. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
SOCAN’s argument on Bill C-11 states: Bill C-11 must remain broad so that it can adapt to future online services, whose models for delivering content are not yet known. [read post]
12 May 2009, 2:18 pm
Provided that those conditions are fulfilled, the application of such rules to the sale of products from another Member State meeting the requirements laid down by that State is not by nature such as to prevent their access to the market or to impede access any more than it impedes the access of domestic products (see Joined Cases C-267/91 and C-268/91 Keck and Mithouard, paragraphs 16 and 17, and Case C-110/05 Commission v Italy, paragraph 36, see here… [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 1:22 pm
C. [read post]
29 May 2014, 12:05 pm
Rev. ___ (2014): Our federal, state, and local governments provide a subsidy that enhances the political voice of business interests. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:55 am
Regardless, I think there is a more important point to be made about the loss of VanVleet and the current state of Bill C-18, namely that both are the product of similar failed processes. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 9:03 pm
The Court of Justice has handed down an interesting judgment in a follow-on case in Case C-427/06 Birgit Bartsch v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 7:36 am
It’s a non-recourse loan, and interest rates are typically low at about 5% to 6% because of its high security. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 11:09 pm
That is not in consumers' best interests. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 2:00 am
Regina (Vodafone Ltd and Others) v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, Office of Communications and Others, interested parties Case C-58/08 Court of Justice of the European Union “No principles of European Union law were infringed in capping charges made by mobile telephone operators to customers for calls made outside their home state but within the Community. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:24 pm
Arizona live on C-SPAN this morning. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 1:22 pm
C. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:07 pm
United States Supreme CourtIn case you are interested, for the first time in history, on May 4, C-SPAN will have LIVE audio of the U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 2:49 am
In this case, C-KORE had a SC carried out at the premises of its competitor NOVAWELL. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 8:13 am
In a follow-up article last month, we provided an update on the status of these five supermajority tax challenges pending around the state, including trial court decisions made in the two San Francisco Proposition C actions. [read post]
