Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF E.R."
Results 61 - 80
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2012, 2:01 am
A perfectly accurate way to begin that opinion would be: The constitution guarantees due process when the state invades a protected interest, such as when it seeks termination of parental rights. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:30 pm
Also, on another hot topic, Wayne D’Angelo has a nice summary of hydraulic fracturing developments in various states. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 3:07 am
His recent opinion for the court, In the Interest of E.R., is a fine example. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:48 am
The Court found no indication that the application strived to further interests other than those that were concurrently interests of the State. [read post]
Texas Supreme Court rejects notice by publication for many parental-termination cases [Jul. 6, 2012]
6 Jul 2012, 10:24 am
Notice by Publication: Maybe not the best idea in parental-termination cases In re E.R., J.B., E.G., and C.L., children, No. 11-0282 (DB) (Jefferson, C.J.) [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:00 am
Another old English case, Banks v Goodfellow (1870), All E.R. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:00 am
Baron Cawley [1975] 3 All E.R. 625 (H.L.) stated that using public policy to make void a condition based on religion, "…would bring about a substantial reduction of another freedom, firmly rooted in our law, namely that of testamentary disposition". [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
I asked esteemed fellow blogger Antonin I. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 3:25 pm
They will work with you to protect your interests throughout the proceedings. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Can neighbours sue for historic contamination? [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:20 am
Heller & Partners Ltd., [1963] 2 All E.R. 575 (H.L.), a tort action for negligent misstatement would have been regarded as incapable of success. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
One study of gallbladder removal surgeries demonstrated that surgeons did not reach a "steady state of quality" until they'd done 50 gallbladder removals. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:14 am
The idea appears to have been widely accepted — for example it was argued by counsel in Cardwell v Lucas (1836) 2 Meeson and Welsby 111 150 E.R. 691 and upheld by yhe Court of Exchequer in Gandy v Jubber (1865) 5 Best and Smith 15 122 E.R. 914. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:08 am
The interest transferred is called the leasehold interest. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:06 am
Having considered the earlier judgment of Mustill J (as he then was), in Finelvet AG v Vinava Shipping Co Ltd (The Chrysalis) [1983] 2 All E.R. 658, he stated that “it is very doubtful that the court has jurisdiction to hear an appeal from arbitrators on questions of fact, even if the parties were to agree to such an appeal. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 5:52 pm
The PCC Code until October 2009 stated that “Whenever the public interest is invoked, the PCC will require editors to demonstrate fully how the public interest was served”. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 5:10 pm
A (By his Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor) ([2010] 3 All E.R. 32) discussed in the previous post in this series. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
In its conclusion in that case the Court stated “As the Court has stated above, it considers that the decisive factor in balancing the protection of private life against freedom of expression should lie in the contribution that the published photos and articles make to a debate of general interest. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Being in Pennsylvania, for quite some time we’ve had more than a passing interest in this section of the Third Restatement and its essentially negligence (“reasonableness”)-based theory of product liability. [read post]
