Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF H. W." Results 61 - 80 of 1,312
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm by Guest Author
  Given the way Treasury schedules work, we as a nation must borrow to pay interest on the debt already owed. [read post]
15 May 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Ravitch, Contextual Benefits of a Neutral Principles Approach to Religious Property Disputes, 2021 Michigan State Law Review 1347-1376 (2021).Anita Bernstein, Without Religion, W(h)ither Family Law? [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the… [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 7:11 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
This has been discussed in the US Supreme Court decision of Rent-A-Center, W., Inc. v. [read post]
Judge Kacsmaryk ignores the agency’s longstanding practice and imposes his own cramped reading of Subpart H. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 5:51 am by Todd Buchwald
There was a particularly thorny issue regarding “investigative activities” in the United States under section 2004(h) of the ASPA. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.[19] After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:30 am by Kevin Kaufman
New Hampshire exclusively taxes dividend and interest income while Washington only taxes capital gains income. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 2:46 am by Guest Author
What is interesting about this case from an administrative law perspective is that Section 230 was codified into the Telecommunications Act of 1996 which, in turn, was codified into the Communications Act of 1934, one of the federal government’s most important regulatory statutes. [read post]