Search for: "STATE OF CAL., ETC. v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 182
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
Cal. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
If, as some have worried, "[e]achtime the Court overrules a case, the Court . . . cause[s] thepublic to become increasingly uncertain about which casesthe Court will overrule," Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
It is, therefore, of great consequence and concern that the California court summarily decided that the order made against Google could not be enforced in the United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am
Department of Water Resources, et al, etc. (2024) 98 Cal.App.5th 726 (Ct. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
This paper considers societal constitutionalism in its dynamic element—as a system structures constant adjustment among the constituting elements of a governance unit (whether state, corporation, religion, etc.) [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 9:26 am
These distinctions just scratch the surface and add to the complexity of the emerging patchwork of data privacy and security law in the United States. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 9:26 am
These distinctions just scratch the surface and add to the complexity of the emerging patchwork of data privacy and security law in the United States. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
This paper considers societal constitutionalism in its dynamic element—as a system structures constant adjustment among the constituting elements of a governance unit (whether state, corporation, religion, etc.) [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit explained in InteliClear, LLC v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 4:49 pm
Cal., 2014) (“Hanson v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
[The Rhode Island Supreme Court case cited in the briefs is State of Rhode Island v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 11:06 am
For the most part, sub-state regulators–cities, counties, school districts, water boards, etc. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am
Perhaps worse, this standard is stated as being the standard for the Lanham Act in a state law consumer protection case, with citation of but no apparent comprehension of the difference between literal falsity and literal truth that is nonetheless misleading. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 5:41 am
Wolk, 121 Cal. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:07 am
Ass’n, Cal. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
The only exception is for workers who obtain a medi- cal test each week at their own expense and on their own time, and also wear a mask each workday. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
State of California (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 1542. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 10:09 am
Partnership v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm
Sanofi-Aventis United States LLC, 2011 WL 3666595, at *3 (W.D. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 2:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
