Search for: "STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIAM A. CASE" Results 61 - 80 of 556
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2009, 7:19 am
Court Enunciates New Test for Tolling Child Sex Abuse Statute of Limitations By Michael Booth New Jersey Law Journal June 11, 2009 The state Supreme Court on Thursday set out a two-stage analysis that trial judges must conduct to decide whether and for how long the two-year statute of limitations in child sexual abuse suits can be tolled. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:31 am by Jamison Colburn
Supreme Court had previously ruled were unavailable under the federal Constitution: New Jersey’s Mount Laurel litigation (ruling snob zoning unconstitutional), California’s Pruneyard Shopping Ctr. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:35 am by Judge Alan F. Pendleton (Retired)
This state-sanctioned steamboat company granted Aaron Ogden a license to operate steamboats between Elizabethtown Point in New Jersey and New York City. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm by Luke Rioux
In that case, pawn shop owner, William Harris sold drugs with a pistol at his side. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 9:02 am by Howard Friedman
He alleged this infringed his free exercise of religion.In Williams v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:46 pm by Patricia Salkin
Plaintiff William Huff is the managing member of co-plaintiff Ecotone Farm LLC and the owner of a 31–acre plot of land in Harding Township, New Jersey. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Ultimately, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled for Gochman and New Jersey’s hate crime statute.But the state court decision could be reviewed by the U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The major Supreme Court media law case heard in the October Term 2014 was Elonis v United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Where such rulings were broad enough, they tended to create legislative backlash, as happened in New Jersey. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 6:08 am
.: 3-15407Case filed: August 6, 2013Qualifying judgment/order: August 6, 2013 8/6/2013 11/4/2013 2013-63 William Graulich, IV and iVest International Holdings, Inc.Case number: 09-cv-4355 (United States District Court for the District of New Jersey)Case filed: August 26, 2009Qualifying judgment/order:… [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 5:25 am by Ronald Mann
Justice Sotomayor commented that she “just d[id]n’t understand how” Section 27 barred the New Jersey court from hearing the case. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 12:17 pm by Greg Mersol
  The plaintiffs were all citizens of California, and Hertz contended that its principal place of business was New Jersey  because that was the state where its headquarters and primary operations were centered. [read post]