Search for: "STATE V. TOWER"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2016, 12:32 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 1:30 pm
A cell tower in Emeryville, Calif. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 10:45 am
United States. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:19 am
Fifth Estate Tower concludes that the state’s Consumer Protection Act’s sanctions for unfair and deceptive trade practices cannot constitutionally be applied... [read post]
2 Oct 2006, 12:06 am
Keltner v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:28 am
For that reason, well-known cases like United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:31 am
§ 332(c)(7), states that except as otherwise provided, local zoning authority over cell towers is preserved. [read post]
21 May 2012, 9:03 pm
In the wake of the case (.pdf), United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:13 pm
SBA Towers V, LLC, 391 F.Supp.3d 123 (DMA 2019) [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 5:31 pm
But that's not the New York state record. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 9:32 am
On January 14, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in T-Mobile South, LLC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 11:16 pm
Corp v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:13 am
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School The en banc Eleventh Circuit ruled this week in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 1:54 pm
In Village of Pelham Manor v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 12:47 pm
When the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 9:46 am
In granting summary judgment to Tower, the New York County Supreme Court held: In Marshall [v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 2:30 pm
But such towers are subject to zoning and regulatory approvals at the state and local levels, and states and localities, which traditionally control land use, do not always want new towers in their backyards. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 12:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:41 am
United States is not law. [read post]