Search for: "STATE v WHITMER" Results 61 - 80 of 104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2022, 6:12 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Alaska Case Demonstrates Legal Perils of Livestreaming Jury Trials The Sun Journal’s description of State of Alaska v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Whitmer (IGRA; Michigan Indian Land Claims Settlement Act)Yurok Tribe v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
Lucy, an African American graduate student, enrolled at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, pursuant to a court order in the case of Lucy v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 8:47 am by Matt Cooper
Whitmer (election contest): https://electioncases.osu.edu/case/law-v-whitmer/ From a Carson City District Judge’s decision dismissing the case: “The Contestants failed to meet their burden to provide credible and relevant evidence to substantiate any of the grounds set forth in NRS 293.410 to contest the 2020 General Election. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:45 pm by Matt Cooper
Whitmer, a case filed by Sidney Powell’s legal team, a petition for writ of certiorari and motion for expedited consideration remain pending in the U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm by Andrew Hamm
Whitmer 20-47Issue: Whether a state liquor law that allows in-state retailers to ship wine directly to consumers, but prohibits out-of-state retailers from doing so, is invalid under the nondiscrimination principle of the commerce clause or is a valid exercise of the state’s 21st amendment authority to regulate the sale of alcoholic beverages within its borders. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 3:04 pm by Heath Gelman
Similar to many lawsuits on this uniquely 2020 issue, the case (Gavrilides Management Company v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 3:09 am by Benjamin Beaton
Whitmer, 2020 WL 2185553 (May 5, 2020), a split order, which addressed the First Amendment’s applicability to state election signature requirements and deadlines. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm by Bryn Hines
The guidance, issued in the aftermath of the Dobbs v. [read post]