Search for: "STATE v. LOOMIS" Results 61 - 80 of 98
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2015, 12:01 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
Secretary of State John Kerry is pushing for a U.S. no-fly zone over Syria, CNN tells us. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 5:08 pm by Timothy Edgar
Today’s decision by the European Court of Justice on safe harbor – Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 5:34 am by Elina Saxena
Michael Knapp provided a primer on United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:26 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
As ever, SCOTUSBlog has the details on the case, Bank Markazi v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:42 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Lawrence “Lee” Loomis, Loomis Wealth Solutions, LLC, John Hagener, and Lismar Financial Services, LLCCase Number: 10-cv-00458 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California)Case Filed: February 23, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: January 21, 2015 3/31/15 6/29/15 2015-34 SEC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2014, 2:51 pm by Ruthann Robson
Loomis, United States District Judge Catherine Eagles held the "speech and display" provisions of North Carolina's "The Woman‟s Right to Know Act"... [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:23 am by Ken White
Penn of Michigan State University or Erik Loomis of the University of Rhode Island, readers argue about whether taxpayer-funded public university professors should or can be fired for their speech. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 7:59 pm
"Conclusory statements and rough estimates of value are not sufficient" (People v Loomis, 56 AD3d 1046, 1047; see People v Selassie, 166 AD2d 358, 359, lv denied 77 NY2d 911). [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:25 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Linebacker Jonathan Vilma and defensive coordinator Gregg Williams (Photo credit: Wikipedia)New Orleans Saints linebacker Jonathan Vilma last week filed an 11-count defamation suit against NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana arising from the league's response to the Saints' "Bounty Rule" scandal.In Vilma v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 7:31 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Here is the story – well-presented by two lawyers from Williams Mullen – of the Seventh Circuit deciding this month, in the case of Loomis v Exelon Corporation, that holding retail class mutual fund shares, rather than cheaper institutional share classes, in a defined contribution plan was not sufficient to establish fiduciary liability. [read post]