Search for: "STEIN v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 61 - 80 of 105
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Lynch dissented, in part relying on a 1999 decision of the Third Department in Matwijczuk v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am by Amy Howe
  On Wednesday, the Court heard oral arguments in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
” Lauren Bateman noted that the Department of Justice filed a motion last week to “intervene, stay, and dismiss” a private lawsuit against an NGO using the state secrets privilege. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Simon Fodden
So a searcher or indexer may have to translate his/her currently common language in order to adequately search for or index older texts and improperly motivated and misused language.[3] But in spite of TAR’s serious shortcomings, compelled by the high cost of “review,” U.S. judges are now approving the use of TAR devices with which to allege adequate searching and production, even though such devices do not yet have a reputation for, let alone a history of, reliability.[4] Such… [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Such was the holding of the April 11, 2013 decision of the Appellate Division, First Department, in Sequeira v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:12 am by Roy Ginsburg
Department of Justice policy has evolved to reflect this principle as well – such interference results in a Sixth Amendment (right-to-counsel) violation. ? [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am by Robert Chesney
Defendant was targeted as a potential terrorist and became the subject of an ongoing investigation by the New York Joint Terrorism Task Force (“JTTF”) comprised of Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) agents and New York City Police Department (“NYPD”) detectives. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:15 am by admin
Justice Foundation have claimed that discharging Sgt. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:06 am by Kiran Bhat
As Lyle reported for this blog, yesterday a Fifth Circuit panel ordered the Department of Justice to clarify the Administration’s position on judicial review following the President’s remarks. [read post]