Search for: "STEVENS v. PAGE" Results 61 - 80 of 1,395
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
”[11] Not content to leave it well said, the chapter’s authors returned to the confidence interval and provided another, more problematic definition, a couple of pages later in the text: “A confidence interval is a range of possible values calculated from the results of a study. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:00 pm
Okay, maybe the reader could have done without the page and a half about general personal jurisdiction, because obviously that doesn't exist, and no one (as far as I can tell, anyway) is even arguing that it does. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Marc DeGirolami
All readings are posted to the Canvas page with the following exceptions. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 10:46 am by Eric Goldman
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
 Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am by Guest Author
If you’d rather just see all the pieces listed chronologically, there’s a more straightforward bibliography at the bottom of the page. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm by Josh Blackman
At page 48 of the UNC arguments, Sotomayor asked Patrick Strawbridge to explain how a model works. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
The haunted house requires participants to get a doctor’s note and sign a 40-page waiver before they enter. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 1:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
I discuss this (in 72 pages) in a 2016 article, The "Speech Integral to Criminal Conduct" Exception. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm by Mark Walsh
And then it is on to the argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:12 am by Eric Goldman
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]