Search for: "STONE v. HOLDER"
Results 61 - 80
of 182
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm
Young 13-95Issue: (1) Whether the state forfeits an argument that Stone v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
He further points out that inanimate right-holders have now been created such as corporations. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
Young 13-95Issue: (1) Whether the state forfeits an argument that Stone v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:22 am
Where a passing off case is equivalent to a trade mark case, the rights holder may be entitled to all profits earned on the ground that the distinguishing mark enables all of the sales. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 6:57 am
Eliot Kim summarized the Supreme Court’s ruling in Jam v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 10:02 am
Only one outlier judge in the UK has so far tried to usurp jurisdiction on a global scale (in Unwired Planet v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:32 pm
In fact, it’s fair to view Function Media v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 9:42 am
In CCNV v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm
As you may recall, the FTC is pursuing 1-800 Contacts for antitrust violations based on 1-800 Contacts having sued and then settled with competitors who bought keyword ads on 1-800 Contacts’ trademarks. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:33 am
And Quinta posted the Lawfare Podcast: "Goldsmith v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 8:16 am
For one of the prior cases on this, Morris v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
S. 496, 529–530 (1939) (opinion of Stone, J.). [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:37 pm
LH subcontracted All Emporium Stone (AES), a family business, in which Mr Michael Tsahrelias worked along with his father. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
For present purposes, however, the important point to understand is that Trump’s primary merits argument, to which he devotes the first 13 pages of the Argument section of his brief (pp. 20-33), concerns only the second, middle “Officials Clause,” which identifies the current and former office-holders to whom Section 3 potentially applies, rather than the government positions that an insurrectionist or rebel is ineligible to occupy going forward. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
For instance: when does the alteration of objects incorporating the protected work involve a new authorisation from the right holder? [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
For example, in 2020, the Delaware Court of Chancery addressed both prongs of Caremark in the Teamsters v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 9:23 am
See Lenz v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:52 pm
Stone Mill Const. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:30 am
If a corporate dissolution contest could be re-imagined as a TV game show, I'd call the case of Rodriguez v. [read post]
