Search for: "STONE v. HOPE" Results 61 - 80 of 420
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2016, 6:02 pm by Mark Tushnet
I'm working from memory here, so I'm sure I'll make (I hope) small mistakes. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 12:00 am by Rumpole
To paraphrase the new testament, let he who is same at age fifty as he was at seventeen throw the first stone. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
In this week’s case (Miller v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 5:06 pm by Greg Helding
As Ben Stone, one of my favorite TV lawyers, once said, “All clichés are true. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 12:53 am by David Pocklington
The earlier post “Sufficient interest” in faculty petitions concerns a petition for a confirmatory faculty for the introduction of an unauthorized ledger stone, and explores some features of “sufficient interest” in faculty petitions, Re St Lawrence Toot Baldon [2023] ECC Oxf 10. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
We have two topics dominating today’s conversation on LXBN: the Supreme Court ruling in Christopher v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
There are of course undemocratic societies in which free speech is an idle hope. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 7:50 am
At the same time, along this journey we also encounter many stumbling stones, which make it more difficult and demanding to hasten towards the Risen Lord. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 1:30 am
Certain fringe groups hope to change this by passing anti-bullying legislation (see Sticks and stones may break my bones...). [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Stone has long cultivated a public image as a dirty trickster on the edges of mainstream politics. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 3:24 am by Edith Roberts
Today, the court will hear oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 11:43 am by Katherine Stone
Stone is Arjay and Frances Fearing Miller Distinguished Professor of Law at UCLA School of Law. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Second, with respect to the Caremark claim, the more recent exposition of Caremark in Stone v. [read post]