Search for: "STRONG v. CLARK et al"
Results 61 - 68
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2010, 9:24 am
., ET AL., __ N.J. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1986) (describing the analytical method as "subtract[ing] the infringer's usual or acceptable net profit from its anticipated net profit realized from sales of infringing devices"); see also John Skenyon et al., Patent Damages Law & Practice § 3:4, at 3-9 to 3-10 (2008) (describing the analytical method as "calculating damages based on the infringer's own internal profit projections for the infringing item at the time… [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 8:13 am
RONALD DEVITO, ET AL.; (A-4951-06T1; Decided August 3, 2009): Picture by PhillipC Notwithstanding any limitations in the language of a Will, the probable intent of the testator must prevail. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 9:32 pm
July 9, 2008); Iovate Health Sciences Inc. et al v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 8:14 pm
Assuming no injuries, you are likely to get yellow card suspension (see Oguchi Onyewu, Michael Bradley, et al), heaven forbid a red card suspension, and simple exhaustion. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 4:21 am
Rees, Commissioner, Kentucky Department of Corrections, et al. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
REES, ET AL., Respondents. [read post]
