Search for: "SWIFT GROUP, LLC"
Results 61 - 80
of 112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2015, 10:01 pm
Swift. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
Here once again is our ever-dependable friend Alberto Bellan's take on last week's substantive Katposts, specially designed to facilitate a swift catch-up for those good folk whose professional, academic, commercial or romantic commitments kept them from reading them when they first came out. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
ROYSTON, RAYZOR, VICKERY, & WILLIAMS, LLP v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 6:35 am
©2015 Amaxx LLC. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 8:12 am
But we’ve also seen some troubling Section 230 rulings for ad networks, including the Swift v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:08 am
Copyright © 2015 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:42 am
| Dutch Minister and EPO immunity | CJEU and droit de suite in Case C-41/14 Christie's France | Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others | Pangyrus Ltd v OHIM, RSVP Design Ltd | China and smartphone patents | UK against groundless threats to sue for IP infringement | Polar bears | Patent needs strictness, complexity and fuzziness. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
| Dutch Minister and EPO immunity | CJEU and droit de suite in Case C-41/14 Christie's France | Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others | Pangyrus Ltd v OHIM, RSVP Design Ltd | China and smartphone patents | UK against groundless threats to sue for IP infringement | Polar bears | Patent needs strictness, complexity and fuzziness. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
.* Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 4: harmony between parties in ‘lyrical’ patent disputeLast Thursday, Jeremy reported a High Court Order obtained by Warner-Lambert (part of the Pfizer group) mandating the NHS to release guidance about the prescribing of pregabalin (Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group PTC EHF & Others[2015] EWHC 485 (Pat) (02 March 2015)) [on which see the IPKat earlier posts, here and here]. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
. * Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 3: a "lyrical" solution to a painful patent disputeAfter the Patents Court ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others, which Darren reported here, Jeremy has got some news to break on that painful patent war.* Blind faith not enough when proving bad faith: a case of ColourblindnessValentina reports on a fresh trade mark dispute that the General Court has just decided, Pangyrus Ltd v… [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
.* Random thoughts on Ms Swift's "sick" trade marksTaylor Swift has filed a number of marks seeking protection for lines or quotes of lyrics from songs or song titles of her most recent album 1989. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 3:03 pm
The White Law Group, LLC is a national securities fraud, securities arbitration, investor protection, and securities regulation/compliance law firm with offices in Chicago, Illinois and Vero Beach, Florida. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:17 am
You can’t rely just on technical safeguards and the IT group. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
The White Law Group, LLC is a national securities fraud, securities arbitration and investor protection law firm with offices in Chicago, Illinois and Vero Beach, Florida. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 11:03 am
The White Law Group, LLC is a national securities fraud, securities arbitration and investor protection law firm with offices in Chicago, Illinois and Vero Beach, Florida. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 11:02 am
The White Law Group, LLC is a national securities fraud, securities arbitration and investor protection law firm with offices in Chicago, Illinois and Vero Beach, Florida. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm
Earlier this year, Swift Transportation Company agreed to pay $4.4 million to resolve a class complaint alleging that it violated the FCRA by failing to obtain the authorization of online applicants before having criminal background checks run and then relied on the results to take adverse actions without notifying the applicants of their rights (Ellis, III v Swift Transportation Co of Arizona). [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 6:43 am
Denying their motion to quash the employer’s subpoena in part, a federal district court in Colorado ruled that although their personal right to information in the employment files was sufficient to confer standing to bring their motion, the majority of the records requested were discoverable since they were relevant to, amongst other things, their credibility and whether their requested accommodations were unreasonable and/or unduly burdensome (EEOC v JBS USA, LLC dba JBS… [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:00 am
Robertson v Swift, heard 19 March 2014. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:32 am
Robertson v Swift, heard 19 March 2014. [read post]
