Search for: "Sacks v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 598
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2021, 8:54 am
It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 10:28 am
But the constructive discharge claim is dismissed for good.The case is Byer v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 2:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 4:01 pm
United StatesMeriwether v. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:29 pm
Kurup discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:53 am
SC Johnson & Son v. [read post]
16 May 2021, 6:25 pm
It was with this in mind that one might usefully approach the recognition, publicly (and at last) of the massacre of a large portion of the Chinese population of Torreón, in the Mexican state of Coahuila, to be acknowledged by Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador who will ask forgiveness of the Chinese community on behalf of the state. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
In its judgment in the case of Handzhiyski v Bulgaria ([2021] ECHR 283) the Fourth Section of the Court held, by a six-one majority, that convicting and fining a local politician who had placed a Santa Claus hat on a statute of a former Communist and put a red sack at its feet as part of a political and satirical protest was an unjustified interference with his right to freedom of expression under Article 10. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 10:33 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 9:30 pm
The National Security Archive et. al. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 10:35 am
The section begins: Even if the principles of First Amendment law are applicable in the impeachment context (and many of us believe they are not), many of us believe there is an extraordinarily strong argument that the Supreme Court's standards, articulated in Brandenburg v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:27 am
That settlement was achieved through popular constitutionalism rather than Article V, leaving the election challengers two diametrically opposite choices. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 9:34 am
Univ. of Notre Dame du Lac v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
The joint note verbale also cites the 2016 arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:17 am
See Barnes v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 6:22 am
The trial court dismissed the case.The Court of Appeals (Sack, Wesley and Chin) notes that qualified immunity protects state defendants from litigation if the law was not clearly established at the time of the violation. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:54 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am
in Postiglione v Sacks & Sacks, LLP 2020 NY Slip Op 31164(U) April 17, 2020 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 513779/2019 Judge: Edgar G. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:18 am
He finds that the defendant in this case was denied proper representation because counsel did not object to questionable eyewitness and other evidence.The case is United States v. [read post]
