Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S."
Results 61 - 80
of 6,047
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2020, 9:29 am
These Opinion Letters extend a trend toward the flexible application of the OSE that accords with the Supreme Court’s analysis in Christopher v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:32 am
While arguments can be thrown back and forth, a recent case in the Court of Appeal set to decide the criminal ramifications of the sale of 'grey' goods in the UK, on which the Court handed down its judgment early last month.The case of R v C & Ors dealt with a limited liability company that sold shoes and clothing, the operation of which included several different defendants. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 4:16 am
Lexion Medical, LLC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
Constitution.Background/Plaintiffs’ Claims in Thompson V. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
Ouyeinc, Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 11:36 am
But we can’t afford to wait on [C]ongress. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:25 pm
R.C. 5739.01(H)(1)(c)(v). [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:26 am
C-02-cv-21-000509 (Cir. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 11:43 am
Consumers were confused as to commercial origin; therefore there was clearly use for the purpose of distinguishing the goods in question (per Céline). [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:17 am
The first ruling appealed arises from the court’s denial of exceptions to the foreclosure sale filed by appellants, ... [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 10:07 am
§ 504(c). [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 7:00 am
Penny Company, Inc .v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
It’s described in the December case list as involving the issue of whether title passed to the federal government according to the plaintiff’s contracts at the time Plaintiff took possession of the items, thus establishing the sale for resale exemption recognized in Day & Zimmerman v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 3:25 pm
In an important opinion regarding the first sale doctrine, judge James S. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
Arendi that challenge’s the Federal Circuit’s limitations on the use of common sense in the obviousness analysis. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 9:38 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0130, 2009 MT 354, WOLF’S INTERSTATE LEASING & SALES, L.L.C. doing business as Wolf’s Bozeman Suzuki, L.L.C., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 10:27 pm
Here's what happened: UMG v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 8:14 am
One of the more important changes expected in the regulations is a shift to adhere to the Tax Court’s decision in Mack-Cali Realty, LP, et al. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
Range v. [read post]
