Search for: "Salim v. United States"
Results 61 - 78
of 78
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2008, 3:38 pm
Ed. 2d 640 (1981); see also United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 12:29 pm
Hamdan’s commission remain unanswered — including whether the Constitution of the United States imposes any constraint whatsoever on these trials,” his lawyers contended. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 6:25 am
Bin Mahfouz To download a copy of the Second Circuit's decision, please use this link: Ehrenfeld v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 8:30 am
Bush, 06-1195, and Al Odah v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 11:57 am
United States, two cases that will determine whether Guantánamo detainees have the right to challenge the lawfulness of their detention. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 6:25 am
Today's Hindu carries an op-ed by Vishnu V. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:20 am
• United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 4:51 pm
United States (06-1196). [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 4:51 pm
United States (06-1196). [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
Charles Swift, counsel to Salim Hamdan, the enemy combatant whose legal case, Hamdan v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 10:48 am
" In June 2004, the Supreme Court's Rasul decision held that because the naval base at Guantánamo Bay was under the exclusive control of the United States, the federal habeas corpus statute extended to detainees held there. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 9:25 am
Only the United States -- that is, the prosecution before a war crimes trial commission - may pursue pre-trial appeals. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
United States, No. 06-1196: "1. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 3:17 pm
Hamdan may seek further review in the Supreme Court of the United States at the earliest available opportunity. [read post]
1 May 2007, 11:01 pm
Supreme Court declined pretrial review of the military commissions expected to try detainees Omar Khadr and Salim Ahmed Hamdan, U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 1:22 pm
Bush (06-1195) and Al Odah v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 6:59 am
But noncitizens like Hamdan don't have the sort of "substantial connection with our country" that justifies invoking the constitutional right to habeas corpus, the Supreme Court ruled in 1990, in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2006, 7:32 am
But, like a lot of conservatives, he was so irritated by the Supreme Court's decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
