Search for: "Sample v. Clarke"
Results 61 - 80
of 146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2010, 4:30 am
" The Complaint is captioned as Clark v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 1:14 pm
This waiver of attorney-client privilege was first recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Clark v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:09 am
Mathews, Dinsdale and Clark, [1999] O.J. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm
Lenz v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 5:12 pm
- 9th Circuit says No (Arellano v Clark Cty. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
Clark; and must be accompanied by “a detailed explanation based on the record,” Clemons v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 4:44 pm
A routine FSIS ground beef surveillance sample collected in March 2023 was closely related to bacteria from sick people’s samples. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 6:07 am
July 22, 1999); Clark v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 12:50 pm
Because this sample is more limited than the larger sample of cases between the 2013 and 2017 terms, I limited the number of topics to seven, with seven terms per topic (unless multiple terms had equal weights). [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 8:04 am
U.S. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 1:46 pm
PeaceHealth v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
A&M Records, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:23 am
For example, it has been established by the Supreme Court of Canada that a man masturbating at the window of his lighted living room for which his neighbours could witness was not in a public place (see: R v Clark, 2005 SCC 2 (CanLII), [2005] 1 SCR 6). [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 8:58 am
Clark, 319 F.3d. 465 (9th Cir. 2003); Powers v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:20 am
Many are cited in our Philip Morris v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 1:51 pm
From Bloom to Bloomsbury -- it's IP in Ireland Not a second edition this time but a third, and also not a moment too soon, is Intellectual Property Law in Ireland, crafted by a talented trio of the IPKat's friends -- distinguished academic Bob Clark, plus that amiable pair of practitioners from FRKelly, Shane Smyth & Niamh Hall. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 7:01 am
An employee who tested positive for alcohol after fracturing her ankle on the job had her ADA claim tossed on summary judgment after a federal district court in Mississippi concluded that she could not show her injury substantially limited a major life activity or that her termination under the employer’s zero-tolerance policy was pretextual (Clark v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
Rasmussen, "The Story of Case v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:29 am
Granting summary judgment for the employer, the court found that her fracture was not a “disability” under the Act and she failed to show that her termination under the policy was pretext for discrimination (Clark v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
I am happy to report the publication of my article, "The Corporate Social Responsibilities of Financial Institutions for the Conduct of their Borrowers: The View From International Law and Standards," Lewis & CLark Law Review 21(4):881-920 (2018). [read post]
