Search for: "Samuel Barnes"
Results 61 - 80
of 191
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2019, 4:07 am
At Take Care, Kate Huddleston worries that Justices Samuel Alito’s and Neil Gorsuch’s opinions last term in The American Legion v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 4:20 am
Roberts Jr. and Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Samuel A. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm
The Washington Post’s regular court reporter, Robert Barnes, has been aided in recent days by ace legal reporter Ann Marimow. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
” Robert Barnes reports for The Washington Post that Alito and Kagan told the lawmakers that “[d]espite public support for televising Supreme Court hearings, the ban will remain for the foreseeable future and the issue isn’t much of a topic of conversation among the justices. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:56 am
” Additional coverage comes from Jessica Gresko at AP, Kevin Daley at The Daily Caller, Adam Liptak at The New York Times, Lawrence Hurley at Reuters, Ariane de Vogue at CNN, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, and Tim Zubizaretta at Jurist. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 5:24 pm
” Justice Samuel A. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:38 am
” Kevin Daley of The Daily Caller covers Justice Samuel Alito’s statement (joined by three other justices) regarding denial of review in the case of a football coach fired after praying with his players, in which Alito “criticized the 1990 Employment Division v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:57 am
” Additional coverage comes from Kevin Daley at The Daily Caller, Joan Biskupic at CNN, Samuel Chamberlain at Fox News, Ann Marimow and Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, and Tony Mauro at The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required). [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
” For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that, over a dissent from Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, the court also “declined … to review lower court decisions that blocked efforts in two states to cut off public funding for Planned Parenthood, refusing for now to get involved in state battles over abortion rights. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 4:26 am
Dan Epps and Ian Samuel look ahead at this week’s cases in the latest episode of First Mondays (podcast). [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 4:08 am
” At First Mondays (podcast), Ian Samuel and Leah Litman “discuss their favorite and least favorite moments of the … hearings. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:28 pm
More coverage from the Post comes from Robert Barnes and Michael Kranish. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 4:16 am
” For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes identifies “[t]wo factors [that] animate U.S. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 6:29 am
Barnes, 94 Ohio St.3d 21 (2002) (A plain error must be an obvious defect in the proceedings that affects substantial rights.) [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 4:17 am
” In the latest episode of First Mondays (podcast), Leah Litman and Ian Samuel talk to Rick Hasen about his book, “The Justice of Contradictions: Antonin Scalia and the Politics of Disruption. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 4:02 am
Robert Barnes reports for The Washington Post that “[a] Senate committee released a sliver of the voluminous White House record of Supreme Court nominee Brett M. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:23 am
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that “Judge Brett M. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am
Robert Costa and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post report that Trump said yesterday he was “close” to a final decision; Maggie Haberman, Adam Liptak and Michael Schmidt of The New York Times report that “he might need to extend the process well into Monday. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:55 am
Hardiman is a solid, although hardly knee-jerk, conservative who was active in Republican politics before joining the federal bench, and his jurisprudence as a Supreme Court justice likely would be closer to another justice who hails from the 3rd Circuit: Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
” At ThinkProgress, Ian Millhiser argues that Gorsuch’s position in this case shows that, unlike Justice Samuel Alito, he “is willing to hand liberals a small victory on the path to a much larger effort to shift legal doctrines to the right,” and that “his separate opinion in Dimaya suggests that he sees this case as one step in a broader anti-regulatory journey. [read post]
