Search for: "Samuel Graves"
Results 61 - 80
of 235
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2021, 9:30 pm
Barco talks with former LHB Guest Blogger Samuel Fury Childs Daly “about his J. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 5:09 am
,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 4:59 pm
Justice Samuel Alito dissented from that decision, in a 10-page opinion that was joined by Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
The government is “gravely concerned” about the implications, Guarnieri observed, though he conceded that, “as a matter of practice,” there are actually few ISDA agreements currently in force. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
Readers interested in learning about another Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act case currently before the Supreme Court, Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 11:48 am
The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 9:43 am
The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 5:08 am
” Justice Samuel Alito Jr., joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, included in the order a statement that said: “In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 9:30 am
So to say that the public interest militates against Petitioners would be a grave understatement. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 4:12 pm
., Samuel L. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:00 am
Compare his 15 with the total number of such opinions written by Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan (9), or the total for Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito (15), or even the total for Justice Anthony Kennedy alone (7). [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 8:00 am
In the early hours this morning, after a flurry of last-minute filings, a divided Supreme Court cleared the way for federal executions to resume for the first time in nearly 20 years. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:05 pm
Although the justices declined to block the order on procedural grounds, Justice Clarence Thomas, Justice Samuel Alito, and Justice Neil Gorsuch indicated that they would have granted the application if not for the procedural errors. [read post]
21 May 2020, 7:38 am
Dissent Justice Samuel Alito dissented, in an opinion joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Elena Kagan. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:23 pm
Justice Samuel Alito described himself as “somewhat baffled” by Letter’s statement, in response to a question from Ginsburg, that “the protection against the use of a subpoena for harassment” of the president is “simply the assessment whether the subpoena is relevant to some conceivable legislative purpose. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm
In support of its motion, the state asserted that the continued operation of the public charge rule is “gravely hindering” efforts to “stop the spread of COVID-19 and protect the health and well-being of our residents” by “deterring immigrants from accessing publicly funded health care. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
En esencia, el Tribunal profundamente divido – fracturado, para utilizar lenguaje propio de la decisión – revocó una norma que databa de 1972 negando el derecho a un veredicto unánime a personas procesadas por delitos graves en los estados. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 2:22 pm
Justice Samuel Alito has the most majority opinions, with four, followed by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, with three. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 9:50 am
We the undersigned agree with New Jersey State Senator Joe Pennacchio that all levels of government should work together to ameliorate the COVID-19 pandemic by developing an early treatment to minimize the effects of the virus and reduce its communicability by decreasing viral shedding with the use of Hydroxychloroquine: Anika Ackerman MD Urology Joseph Addeo MD Oncology Munir Ahmed MD Orthopedics Niran Al-Agba DO Pediatrics Frank Alario MD Internal Medicine Sharon Carswell MD Family Medicine… [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 1:58 pm
Justice Samuel Alito also filed a concurring opinion, in which he argued that the trial court’s habitual-residence determination should be reviewed under an even more deferential standard, known as “abuse of discretion. [read post]
