Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,615
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Scalia, J., thought Presidents were "officers of the United States" (Lawfare). [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am
United States, Justice Scalia stated, “we have never thought that the interpretation of those charged with prosecuting criminal statutes is entitled to deference. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Numerous studies show that Chevron deference is currently the exception rather than the rule, and since 2001’s United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 1:40 pm
United States, 567 U.S. 387, 419 (2012) (Scalia, J., dissenting). [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:12 pm
James Madison’s criticism of the early state governments, recorded in his 1787 memo on the “Vices of the Political System of the United States,” emphasized not just the overbearing “multiplicity” of laws, but also the pathetic “mutability” of their laws—two sides of the same coin. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am
” How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
United States, 139 S. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
" Biden v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm
United States, so it is hard to be wildly enthusiastic about any of them. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:22 pm
Worcester ed., 1859) (defining "office" as "a publick charge or employment; magistracy");United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:44 pm
Supreme Court case, United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 10:38 am
Cue Bush v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
United States, 512 U.S. 452, 464 (1994) (Scalia, J., concurring). [read post]