Search for: "Schmidt v. Superior Court" Results 61 - 80 of 88
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Schmidt, 2014 ONSC 1474 (Chttp://canlii.ca/t/g62sf -> Employee fired for accessing personal health Information Health Sciences Association of Sask v SAHO 2014 CanLII 9578 http://t.co/t7ayO64SFO -> Printout of Facebook page electronic document admiitted into evidence R v Nde Soh, 2014 NBQB 20://canlii.ca/t/g50jc -> Court gags Dotcom bodyguard – National – NZ Herald News http://t.co/kuDeuOOjlF -> No invasion of privacy to post photo of mural… [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 7:06 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Superior Court Judge Jane Orie-Melvin, the Republican candidate, defeated fellow Superior Court Judge Jack Panella, a Democrat, for the open Pennsylvania Supreme Court seat.Winners at the Superior Court level included Judge Judy Olson from Allegheny County, Judge Paula Ott from Chester County, Judge Anne Lazarus from Philadelphia County, and Sallie Mundy, a private attorney from Tioga County. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:32 am by Gustav L. Schmidt
Schmidt There is an attraction for companies to incorporate in Delaware, likely due to the abundance of well-known publicly traded corporations that have chosen to incorporate there. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 10:47 pm by Lara
  The court acknowledged that Peters opted-out of the Lockabey v Honda Class action suit in San Diego Superior Court enabling her to seek redress in small claims court. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 2:18 pm
 The Superior Court, in Boyle, addresses this issue citing a Minnesota decision, Schmidt v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:40 am by Larry Downes
  In August of last year, Google CEO Eric Schmidt resigned from Apple’s board. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
In a recent ruling, Schmidt v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1353 (Cal. 1996); MacDonald v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Russell Beck
Missouri: The latest statement by the Missouri Supreme Court (in Whelan Security Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Unlike the Brookings report, the list that follows is not based principally on court documents. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
BAP 1999), the Trustee argued that the ruling had been undermined by the Supreme Court's decision in Drye v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
” The “objective partisan assumption” is that lawyers can make independent ethical evaluations of client behaviour, while also remaining loyal to clients partisan Cognitive biases toward optimism, confirmation of existing beliefs make it much more difficult for lawyers to neutrally assess the behaviour of their own clients The perjury trilemma: lawyers have duties to (1) be competent, (2) preserve client confidences, and (3) be honest in court. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:07 am by Glenn Cohen
  Nightrider then sues Dominos on a vicarious liability theory (called “respondeat superior” when you commit a tort as part of the course of your duty). [read post]