Search for: "Scott v. Columbia, City of" Results 61 - 80 of 156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2015, 2:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the state agency will be Texas Solicitor General Scott A. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Some cases widely anticipated to divide the court along ideological lines, such as Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
City of Los Angeles, 559 F.3d 1046, 1052 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting Winter v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 1:17 pm by Sara Chimene-Weiss, Helen White
By the logic of the Supreme Court’s reigning Second Amendment case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
News We begin with the impressive “Reframing Libel” event at the City University. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit held below, or instead merely supersedes First National City Bank v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
According to an amicus brief tendered in this case by the National Association of Public Insurance Adjusters and the Texas Association of Insurance Adjusters, forty-five states plus the District of Columbia have enacted such statutes.[6] Chapter 4102 expressly prohibits a "person" from acting as a public insurance adjuster in Texas without a license. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
According to an amicus brief tendered in this case by the National Association of Public Insurance Adjusters and the Texas Association of Insurance Adjusters, forty-five states plus the District of Columbia have enacted such statutes.[6] Chapter 4102 expressly prohibits a "person" from acting as a public insurance adjuster in Texas without a license. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:10 am by Jeff Gamso
Oops, guilty.So, under the statute, posting a comment to a newspaper article — or a blog — saying that the article or post author is “fucking out of line” would be a crime: It’s said with intent to offend, it uses an electronic or digital device, and it uses what likely will be seen as profane language (see, e.g., City of Columbia Falls v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:37 am by Amy Howe
In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks back at last week’s decision in Heffernan v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
United States: A Step Further in Privacy Protection but Not Far Enough, Southern University Law Review, Kyllie Mae Guidry, Southern University Law Center, Southern University Law Review, Students A Skeptical View of Information Fiduciaries, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 133, 2019, Forthcoming, Lina Khanand David Pozen, Yale University, Law School and Columbia University – Law School Recording as Heckling, Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 108 (2019), U of Colorado Law Legal… [read post]