Search for: "Scott v. United States Government et al" Results 61 - 80 of 162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm by Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC
Twin America, LLC, et. al, Twin America, Coach, and City Sights together were required to pay $7.5 million in disgorgement to remedy alleged violations of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, Section 1 of the Sherman Act, as well as New York State law, including the Donnelly Act (see Proposed Final Judgment, United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 11:17 am by Jordan Bublick
The United States District Court of the Northern District of Florida made a landmark decision in Brenner, et al. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
[v] The court also considered Delaware’s strong interest in providing a forum for disputes regarding the internal affairs of LLCs formed under its laws. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 9:17 am by Steven Cohen
Trustmark National Bank et alUnited States District Court – Northern District of Alabama – August 19, 2020) involves an alleged wrongful disclosure and sale of a house, owned by the plaintiff Nell Dysart. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:36 am
Katakis, et. al., Corrected Notice of Motion and Memorandum of Points and Authorities 2 (May 5, 2014). [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
(Docket Report) (271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Defendant may not present jury argument concerning KSR’s change to obviousness standard: Datatreasurycorp v Wells Fargo & Co et al (Docket Report) District Court E Texas: Entire operating system cannot serve as royalty base where only the workspace switching feature is accused of infringement: IP Innovation, LLC. et al v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
(Docket Report) (271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Defendant may not present jury argument concerning KSR’s change to obviousness standard: Datatreasurycorp v Wells Fargo & Co et al (Docket Report) District Court E Texas: Entire operating system cannot serve as royalty base where only the workspace switching feature is accused of infringement: IP Innovation, LLC. et al v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
Thus, for instance, Cao, et al., Willingness to Shoot: Public Attitudes Toward Defensive Gun Use, 27 Am. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
Reynolds, et al. -- immunity of wholesale discount prices to challenge under Robinson-Patman Act solely because they are available to all buyers. 06-1617, Gilles v. [read post]